Good Cop / Bad Cop

At this stage in the game I can’t believe I still have to explain this to people. Generally even people who identify as smart, educated, and ‘free Americans’. But here we are.
You light your fireworks and you post your eagles on the internet. You eat your hotdogs and watch your baseball. You love your freedom. But the second someone lodges a complaint about a cop or subset of cops that has violated the sanctity of someone’s rights, you immediately jump to the conclusion that they are calling all cops worthless pigs and advocating Somalian-style anarchy and ‘well that’s just not fair because you knew a cop once who was a good guy and so therefore you must hate America!’
Calm the fuck down.
Firstly, you are being a hypocrite, because there is not a single intelligent adult in this country, including yourself, who can tell you that they whole-heartedly believe that no department corruption, police brutality, or power abuse happens in literally every police department in the country. If I’m wrong and you ARE that person… well, I envy your naivety. That level of ignorance must be blissful.
Secondly, and more importantly, is that your assumption is wrong in the first place; That guy you know who is a cop probably really is a fantastic fellow, and nobody ever said that he wasn’t.

At this point, I need to briefly sidetrack the conversation for some prerequisite knowledge. We will call this the Heirarchy of a Free Society.
If you’re a regular reader, then you know about the Non-Aggression Principle already. If not, then please take a look at this article. In a truly free society based on the Non-Aggression Principle, your heirarchy is as follows:
Top Tier – The People
This list is your average normal person.
This includes You, Joe Blow down the street, that homeless guy on the corner, that drum-circle hippie, that bible thumping Glenn Beck fellater, the list goes on.

Middle Tier – The Law
This does not exist under the people because the people are above the law, it exists here because there should never be a law that should hinder the daily life of an average member of The People. The Law only exists to provide guidelines for Public Servants to deal with Criminal Shitbags.

Lower Tier – Public Servants
Before you get all bent out of shape, everyone in this group is in ‘Top Tier – The People’ every second of every day that they are not at work. While they are working, however, they are entrusted with a great deal of power and responsibility, and it is very important to understand that while they are working, they WORK FOR the The People. The People are the boss. The boss is in charge, and the Servant does his bidding.
This includes: cops, the government, postal workers, teachers, etc.

Lowest Tier – Criminal Shitbags
Another very important note: In this description, ‘Criminal’ is not defined by ‘The Law’, but by the Non-Aggression Principle. Therefore this list does not include things like people who don’t wish to wear seatbelts, people who wish to use their own time and money to purchase and use ‘illicit’ drugs, people who really have to pee and don’t have access to a bathroom, jaywalkers, people who are willing to provide services such as sex in exchange for money, or anything of that nature that doesn’t actually harm anybody.
It does include things like: rapists, murderers, and the like.

So back to the point; There is a difference between ‘Good’ cops and ‘Bad’ cops.
Good cops understand the tier that they are in and act accordingly. Good cops act in the best interests of the people they are sworn to protect and serve, even [or perhaps ‘especially’] in situations where enforcing ‘The Law’ is, in fact, contradictory to the goal of protecting and serving the people. Good cops understand that they have the discretion to refuse to enforce laws that are not right, moral, constitutional, etc., and they excercise that discretion accordingly.
This is an example of a Good cop:

Bad cops believe that they are two tiers above The People. Bad cops believe that between themselves and The People, is The Law. This is why there are Laws that seek to affect and regulate the daily lives [nonviolent activities that do not harm anybody] of The People, and this is a serious problem in itself. Bad cops act in the best interests of The Law and Themselves rather than The People, and The People only where it is convenient or beneficial to The Law or Themselves. Bad cops cite a responsibility to follow orders and the rule of law, even in cases where it is to the detriment of The People. Bad cops behave in a manner that is not consistent with The Law, and face no consequence, because Bad cops will not enforce The Law against other Bad cops.
There are plenty of examples of Bad cops. I don’t feel a need to reinvent the wheel, so I will post the best montage I am aware of, courtesy of Rob Hustle:

I know or have met a grand total of ‘Good cops’ that I can count on one hand. I admit that my views are skewed, because generally the only cops who would bother me are specifically the ones that are ‘Bad cops’, since the ‘Good cops’ have no reason to interfere with an average person going about a safe and legal activity. When I criticize a cop, or a subset of cops, I am calling those specific cops Bad cops. In 99% of cases, people who fall into the category of Bad cops are not Public Servants, but in fact Criminal Shitbags.

Hopefully this explanation will give you the insight you need to refrain from immediately jumping to an incorrect conclusion in the future, and enable you to have a mutually beneficial and enriching conversation about the current state of national and world affairs. If not, then I fear you are either naive, a hypocrite, an idiot, a Criminal Shitbag, or a Bad cop, or more likely some combination thereof.

The *Other* Casualties of 9/11


There’s going to be and have been a lot of posts today about 9/11, and terrorism, people saying ‘never forget’. Symbols of the American Flag, and Eagles and Patriotism are going to be and have been boundless. I’ve been mostly avoiding the internet today because I knew that this was all I was going to see.

Don’t mistake me;
It was awful.
It was disgusting.
It was tragic.

I, like many of you, remember exactly where I was on that day.
I, like you, remember watching what was happening in awe on live television.
I, like most millennials, was too young at the time to really understand what was going on.

But, now I’m a bit older, and I do understand.
I understand that something else happened that day as well.

It is equally awful.
It is equally disgusting.
It is equally tragic.

Before the bodies were even cold, the government used them as a stage, a soapbox, to start the process of eroding the essential human liberties that were once thought to be inalienable; They were to be protected by our constitution.

On 9/11, every year, people are damned angry (and rightfully so) about the lives lost in 2001.
On 9/11, every year, I am damned angry (and rightfully so) that people are not damned angry enough about having their independence and liberty siphoned away from them, deliberately and systematically, under the façade of “security”, a deliberately vague and emotionally provoking umbrella term.

Below is an overview of some [but certainly not all] of these “casualties”.


• The Patriot Act broadly expands the official definition of
terrorism, so that many domestic groups that engage in
nonviolent civil disobedience could very well find themselves
labeled as terrorists.
• The Government may now prosecute librarians or keepers
of any other records if they reveal that the government
requested information on their clients or members in the
course of an investigation. It has become a crime for these
individuals to try to safeguard your privacy or to tell you
that you are under investigation.


• Government agents may now monitor the First Amendment-
protected activities of religious and political institutions, and
then infiltrate these groups with no suspicion of criminal
activity. This is a return to domestic spying on law-abiding
religious and political groups.
• You may now be the subject of a government investigation
simply because of the political, activist, or advocacy
groups you are involved in, or the statements you make
within these groups.


• A U.S. Department of Justice directive actively encourages
federal, state, and local officials to resist and/or limit access
to government records through Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) requests.
• The Government has conducted immigration hearings in
secret behind closed doors. Such proceedings were once
open to the public. Hundreds, if not thousands, of immigrants
have already been deported in secret.


• Law Enforcement authorities may now conduct secret searches and wiretaps in your home or office
without showing “probable cause.” They need only to claim that intelligence gathering is “a significant
purpose” of their intrusion, even when the primary goal is ordinary law enforcement. They may also
monitor where and to whom you send and receive e-mail, or where you go on the Internet, recording
every e-mail address and website you have been in contact with.
• Law Enforcement may now demand any personal records held by any source including your doctor,
employer, accountant, or library. All they have to do is claim that it is related to an investigation into
“terrorism.” The record keepers may not reveal that your records were provided to the government.
• Judicial oversight of secret searches has been effectively minimized. The Patriot Act directs judges to
consent to secret searches based only on the Government’s assertion that a “significant” purpose of
an investigation is gathering information related to “terrorism,” as the government defines it.


• Americans can now be jailed without a formal charge & without the right to confront the witnesses or
evidence against them. American citizens are now being held in military jails without charge and with-
out a clear path of appeal for their indefinite confinement.
• Hundreds of Arab, Muslim and South Asian men were rounded up in the Ashcroft raids following
September 11, and held for weeks without charges until all were cleared of terrorism charges


• Hundreds of U.S. residents have been detained for months at a time, and denied access to the advice
and advocacy of an attorney. The Government may now monitor conversations between attorneys &
clients in federal jails.
• The Bush Administration filed papers in court that arguing that an American citizen held in a military
jail without charge should be denied access to legal counsel because such access would interfere with
the process of his interrogation.


• The U.S. Government may now jail its residents and citizens indefinitely without charge & without a public trial.


• The U.S. Government has taken into custody individuals they identify as “material witnesses,” trans-
ported them across the country, and held them for months in solitary confinement without charge or
contact with their family.
• According to the Justice Department’s own Inspector General, immigrant men rounded up in the
Ashcroft raids following September 11 and held in the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, NY
were subjected to a pattern of “physical and verbal abuse.”


• Over 82,000 men from Arab, Muslim and South Asian countries registered with the Government
under the Special Registration program. Over 13,000 are now in deportation proceedings. None
have been charged with terrorism.


• The Citizens United ruling that tossed out the corporate ban on making independent expenditures
and financing electioneering communications. Corporations/Unions can now effectively buy elections,
because they can spend unlimited sums on ads and other political tools specifically endorsing or
denouncing candidates.
• The Transportation Security Administration was created. Now citizens must go through what essentially amount to
customs checkpoints, and be intrusively screened by federal employees, with no probably cause, in order to make a domestic
flight. They aren’t even effective at stopping actual terrorism.

Food for thought.
God Bless America.